Multimodal Literacy and Visual Grammar in ESP Vocabulary Development: Insights from Air Force Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33005/ijl.v3i1.71Keywords:
action research, air force terminology, ESP vocabulary development, multimodal literacy, visual grammarAbstract
Background: This action research study investigates the effectiveness of visual grammar and multimodal resources in teaching and learning specialised English vocabulary within the Air Force context, drawing on Kress and van Leeuwen’s visual grammar theory and Unsworth’s multimodal literacy framework. Objective: The research examines how the compositional, interactive, and representational meanings of visual materials impact vocabulary acquisition and retention among Air Force personnel. Methods: The study analyses how visual design elements and multimodal resources support learning specialised Air Force terminology through iterative planning, implementation, observation, and reflection cycles. Python was used to automate the evaluation of visual materials against established criteria, providing an objective, data-driven analysis of their effectiveness. Data triangulation is achieved through three primary collection tools: semi-structured interviews with learners, classroom observation checklists focusing on learner engagement with visual materials, and vocabulary achievement tests measuring retention and comprehension. Results: The findings reveal how specific visual grammar elements influence vocabulary learning effectiveness, offering systematic criteria for selecting and designing visual materials in Air Force ESP instruction. Conclusion: This research contributes practical guidelines for implementing theoretically grounded visual choices in military ESP contexts while advancing understanding of the application of multimodal literacy in specialised vocabulary instruction.
References
Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality: Foundations, research, and analysis – A problem-oriented introduction. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898
Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Boștină-Bratu, S., Negoescu, A. G., & Palea, L. (2018). Visuality and communication in military English classes. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 24(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2018-0101
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Dixit, A. (2024). Basics of image analysis and manipulation using Python. In I. A. Ansari & V. Bajaj (Eds.), Image processing with Python: A practical approach (pp. 1-1 to 1-27). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-5924-5ch1
Duong, T. M. (2022). Insights into ESP vocabulary learning strategies used by Vietnamese tertiary students. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.10924
Hua, J.-Z., Liu, G.-H., & Song, S.-X. (2019). Content-based image retrieval using color volume histograms. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 1940010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021800141940010X
Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
Juhary, J. (2013). Using military vocabulary and concepts for successful language learning at the Defence University. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 4(3), 1178–1185. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0156
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kulamikhina, I., Kamysheva, E., & Samylova, O. (2021). Integrating visual literacy teaching into the English for Specific Purposes course. In O. Kolmakova, O. Boginskaya, & S. Grichin (Eds.), Language and technology in the interdisciplinary paradigm (Vol. 118, pp. 689–702). European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.84
Kumar, P., Raj, G., & Choudhury, T. (2016). Blur image detection using Laplacian operator and Open-CV. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSMART.2016.7894491
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_6
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2000). Action research in organisations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Narimbetov, M., & Azerbaeva, E. (2022). Importance of implementing visual aids in teaching ESP students. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 5, 29–32. Retrieved from https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/ejlat/article/view/624
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary (Cambridge Language Assessment). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Salazar Pico, I. M., & Mendoza Bravo, K. L. (2024). Visual-spatial learning to enhance teaching vocabulary. Revista Científica Sinapsis, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.37117/s.v24i1.1025
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.
Tran, H. L., & Nguyen, K. L. (2024). Semantic evolution in U.S. Air Force terminology: A corpus-based analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research ICMR12, 2024 (Vol. 2, pp. 116–128). Agricultural Institute Publishing House.
Tran, H. L., Nguyen, K. L., To, T. L. H., & Vu, X. T. (2025). Multimodal strategies for image selection in Air Force terminology teaching: An interdisciplinary study using visual grammar and Python-based image analysis. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Socio-Economic and Environmental Issues in Development, 2025 (pp. 3775–3787). Finance Publishing House.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies, e-literature, and English teaching. Language and Education, 22(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.2167/le726.0
Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2024). A study of vocabulary teaching strategies in ESP instruction and their effects on students’ English vocabulary learning using the Subsumption Sorting Algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1587
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lam Tran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
